It is not news that people are cutting the cable to video services.  According to studies by Oriella PR Network, the loss of viewers and listeners for print/tv/radio was 26.33% in 2010, and this shows no sign of stopping in 2011.  Advertising income is also down 22.03%.  The number of print publications/radio/TV Channels that are being taken off the market is up 52.58% with 17.77% already off the market and 14.23% switching to online delivery in 2010.

Cutting the cable means that more and more people are getting their television from what we have called "Over the Top" video delivery - delivery via the Internet.  New set top boxes from Boxee Box, Apple TV, Roku provide access to content like Netflix, Vudu and Youtube.  Television manufacturers such as Sony are proving interfaces directly on the television itself.  Controlling what you watch, when you watch it is the core concept behind these digital video services.

The problems with cutting the cable are obvious, but will soon be conquered:

  • Watching live sports
  • Watching news that is live or breaking (careful, CNN already seems to play one Anderson Cooper show over and over each day - sorry Anderson)
  • Watching live shows such as the Oscars

But these are not always impediments.  For example, on the Casey Anthony Court Trial, the HLN coverage was live, if not filled with drama enhancing hosts and poorly timed commercials.  A much better uninterrupted feed could be found on the Internet.  We are also likely to see the hacks that allow live streaming on the set top boxes today becoming real features in the very near future.

The number of shows now delivered over the Internet is growing immensely.  These are often less expensive to produce and distribute, therefore avoiding the complex and extremely expensive licensing issues that are driving content resellers nuts.  It is likely that the rising costs of distribution licensing will simply accelerate the adoption of alternative content sourcing and cutting the cable.

What does this mean for the Internet?  Simple: more bandwidth needs at the end user as the number of video watching points is going to rise and the dependency on the Internet for video programming is already showing signs of serious market acceleration.

Comments powered by CComment

Find by Tag

4G Networks 5G Networks 6LoWLAN 6LoWPAN 802.11 802.11ah 802.11ax 802.11ay 802.11az Addressing Analysis Ansible Architecture ARP AToM Baseline BGP Bloom's Taxonomy Broadband Cable cat CellStream Cellular Central Office Cheat Sheet Chrome Cisco Cloud CMD Coloring Rules Computer Consulting Customer Support Data Center Data Networking DHCPv6 DNS Docker Documentation Dublin-Traceroute dumpcap ECMP Ethernet Ethics Evaluation Field Operations Fragmentation G-MPLS GeoIP Git GNS3 Google GQUIC Hands-On History Home Network ICMP ICMPv6 IEEE 802.11p IEEE 802.15.4 India Interface Control Internet IoT IPsec IPv4 IPv6 IRINN IS-IS L2VPN L3VPN LDP Linux LLN LoL M-BGP MAC Macro Microsoft mininet Monitoring MPLS mtr MTU Multicast Name Resolution Netcat Netmiko NetMon netsh Networking Network Science nmap Npcap NSE Observations Online School OpenFlow OSPF OSPFv2 OSPFv3 OSX OTT Paris-Traceroute Parrot PIM PMTU Policy POTS POTS to Pipes PPP Profile Programming Project Management PW3E Python QoS QUIC Remote Desktop Requirements Resume RIP Routing RPL RSVP Rural SDN Security Service Provider Small Business SONET Speed SS7 SSH SSL Subnetting SYSCTL T-Shark TCP TCP/IP Telco Telecom 101 Telecommunications Telephone termshark Testing TLS Tools Traceroute Traffic Engineering Training Travel Tunnel Ubuntu Utility Video Virtualbox Virtualization VoIP VRF VXLAN Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 4 Wi-Fi 5 Wi-Fi 6 Windows Winpcap Wireless Wireless 5G Wireshark Wireshark Tip WLAN Writing Zenmap ZigBee

Twitter Feed